<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 4 Reasons Porsche is the Benchmark for all other Supercars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://993c4s.com/cars/4-reasons-porsche-is-the-benchmark-for-all-other-supercars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://993c4s.com/cars/4-reasons-porsche-is-the-benchmark-for-all-other-supercars/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 18:04:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpawnyWhippet</title>
		<link>http://993c4s.com/cars/4-reasons-porsche-is-the-benchmark-for-all-other-supercars/comment-page-1/#comment-49790</link>
		<dc:creator>SpawnyWhippet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 02:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://993c4s.com/cars/porsche-vs/4-reasons-porsche-is-the-benchmark-for-all-other-supercars/#comment-49790</guid>
		<description>@ Jack.
I beg to differ. Porsche Carrera GT defines a supercar for me. 

@993CS. I would classify the GT2 more as a road-racer than a supercar, coming from a race homologation background. 

The ultimate goalpost have moved on though, and now hypercars rule the roost (Koenigsegg, Enzo, Pagani Zonda R, Lambo LP560-4, Bugatti Veyron)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Jack.<br />
I beg to differ. Porsche Carrera GT defines a supercar for me. </p>
<p>@993CS. I would classify the GT2 more as a road-racer than a supercar, coming from a race homologation background. </p>
<p>The ultimate goalpost have moved on though, and now hypercars rule the roost (Koenigsegg, Enzo, Pagani Zonda R, Lambo LP560-4, Bugatti Veyron)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://993c4s.com/cars/4-reasons-porsche-is-the-benchmark-for-all-other-supercars/comment-page-1/#comment-49729</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 13:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://993c4s.com/cars/porsche-vs/4-reasons-porsche-is-the-benchmark-for-all-other-supercars/#comment-49729</guid>
		<description>John,
I would add a fifth reason - efficiency or engineering - Porsche meets or beats the competition, often with much smaller, more efficient powerplants.  From the first victory at Targa Florio or Carrera Panamericana, the Porsches did more with less.  And it continues today with the Flying Lizards taking the green award at almost every ALMS race.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,<br />
I would add a fifth reason &#8211; efficiency or engineering &#8211; Porsche meets or beats the competition, often with much smaller, more efficient powerplants.  From the first victory at Targa Florio or Carrera Panamericana, the Porsches did more with less.  And it continues today with the Flying Lizards taking the green award at almost every ALMS race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin gosselin</title>
		<link>http://993c4s.com/cars/4-reasons-porsche-is-the-benchmark-for-all-other-supercars/comment-page-1/#comment-1442</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin gosselin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 02:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://993c4s.com/cars/porsche-vs/4-reasons-porsche-is-the-benchmark-for-all-other-supercars/#comment-1442</guid>
		<description>I agree, most Porsches are not super cars. They are sports cars.

That said. They are the most usable, capable sports cars available. Period. End of sentence.

Comparing one spec of a car to one spec of a Porsche is like saying, &quot;Hey, my wife&#039;s nose is prettier than Nicole Kidman&#039;s nose&quot; when the rest of your wife is a size 18.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, most Porsches are not super cars. They are sports cars.</p>
<p>That said. They are the most usable, capable sports cars available. Period. End of sentence.</p>
<p>Comparing one spec of a car to one spec of a Porsche is like saying, &#8220;Hey, my wife&#8217;s nose is prettier than Nicole Kidman&#8217;s nose&#8221; when the rest of your wife is a size 18.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 993C4S</title>
		<link>http://993c4s.com/cars/4-reasons-porsche-is-the-benchmark-for-all-other-supercars/comment-page-1/#comment-1443</link>
		<dc:creator>993C4S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 03:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://993c4s.com/cars/porsche-vs/4-reasons-porsche-is-the-benchmark-for-all-other-supercars/#comment-1443</guid>
		<description>@Jack,

Appreciate your comment and your opinion.

You state, &quot;Porsches simply don&#039;t perform to supercar level...&quot;

What exactly is supercar level and who defines it?

I think the one thing we can all agree to is that the term &quot;supercar&quot; is very subjective and defining it may be next to impossible (or at least agreeing to that definition.)

Maybe I would have been better served to title the article differently?  The point I was trying to make was summed up in this one sentence:

&quot;More and more it seems that Porsche is the brand, standard and benchmark that all others compare themselves.&quot;

If we lose the term &quot;supercar&quot; in the title and replace it with &quot;hi-end sports car&quot;, as in the body of the text, what are your thoughts then?

What about the GT2?

Thanks again for sharing and hope to hear more from you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jack,</p>
<p>Appreciate your comment and your opinion.</p>
<p>You state, &#8220;Porsches simply don&#8217;t perform to supercar level&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>What exactly is supercar level and who defines it?</p>
<p>I think the one thing we can all agree to is that the term &#8220;supercar&#8221; is very subjective and defining it may be next to impossible (or at least agreeing to that definition.)</p>
<p>Maybe I would have been better served to title the article differently?  The point I was trying to make was summed up in this one sentence:</p>
<p>&#8220;More and more it seems that Porsche is the brand, standard and benchmark that all others compare themselves.&#8221;</p>
<p>If we lose the term &#8220;supercar&#8221; in the title and replace it with &#8220;hi-end sports car&#8221;, as in the body of the text, what are your thoughts then?</p>
<p>What about the GT2?</p>
<p>Thanks again for sharing and hope to hear more from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Baruth</title>
		<link>http://993c4s.com/cars/4-reasons-porsche-is-the-benchmark-for-all-other-supercars/comment-page-1/#comment-1446</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Baruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 02:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://993c4s.com/cars/porsche-vs/4-reasons-porsche-is-the-benchmark-for-all-other-supercars/#comment-1446</guid>
		<description>John,

I have to disagree with you here. The Porsche 911 was not, is not, and will never be a &quot;supercar&quot;. Not only does the 911 predate the seminal &quot;supercar&quot; - the Miura - by a few years, it is also, as a concept, in strong opposition to &quot;supercars&quot; in general.

Supercars are designed to be impractical, unreliable, outrageous styling statements; the 356 and 911 are intended to be usable, practical cars. It&#039;s perfectly practical to drive a 911 as a year-&#039;round car; you wouldn&#039;t do that with a &quot;supercar&quot;. Many Porsches have more than 100,000 miles on them, but very few Ferraris or Lamborghinis have even half of that.

Finally, the 911 has rarely had &quot;supercar performance&quot; by the standards of any given time. The 3.3-liter 930  was pretty good, as was the 993 twin-turbo, but in general Porsches simply don&#039;t perform to supercar level, and that&#039;s fine.

To my mind, calling a Porsche a &quot;supercar&quot; demeans both Porsches and actual supercars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>I have to disagree with you here. The Porsche 911 was not, is not, and will never be a &#8220;supercar&#8221;. Not only does the 911 predate the seminal &#8220;supercar&#8221; &#8211; the Miura &#8211; by a few years, it is also, as a concept, in strong opposition to &#8220;supercars&#8221; in general.</p>
<p>Supercars are designed to be impractical, unreliable, outrageous styling statements; the 356 and 911 are intended to be usable, practical cars. It&#8217;s perfectly practical to drive a 911 as a year-&#8217;round car; you wouldn&#8217;t do that with a &#8220;supercar&#8221;. Many Porsches have more than 100,000 miles on them, but very few Ferraris or Lamborghinis have even half of that.</p>
<p>Finally, the 911 has rarely had &#8220;supercar performance&#8221; by the standards of any given time. The 3.3-liter 930  was pretty good, as was the 993 twin-turbo, but in general Porsches simply don&#8217;t perform to supercar level, and that&#8217;s fine.</p>
<p>To my mind, calling a Porsche a &#8220;supercar&#8221; demeans both Porsches and actual supercars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb Pettet</title>
		<link>http://993c4s.com/cars/4-reasons-porsche-is-the-benchmark-for-all-other-supercars/comment-page-1/#comment-1445</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb Pettet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 23:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://993c4s.com/cars/porsche-vs/4-reasons-porsche-is-the-benchmark-for-all-other-supercars/#comment-1445</guid>
		<description>Amen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Manangan</title>
		<link>http://993c4s.com/cars/4-reasons-porsche-is-the-benchmark-for-all-other-supercars/comment-page-1/#comment-1444</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Manangan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 22:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://993c4s.com/cars/porsche-vs/4-reasons-porsche-is-the-benchmark-for-all-other-supercars/#comment-1444</guid>
		<description>I agree with the above article. When other car manufacturers build their own &quot;supercar&quot;, they have to gauge how &quot;good&quot; it is by comparing it against the best, which is the Porsche brand.

But one does not have to rely on these articles to realize that Porsches are the cars used as the measuring stick. I am sure you have all experienced it when your driving on city streets or on the hightways and some nutbag in a souped-up car or in a BMW, Benz, Audi, etc. all seem to want to race you and see how good and fast their car is against your Porsche.

Anyhow, as the slogan goes: Porsche...there is no substitute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the above article. When other car manufacturers build their own &#8220;supercar&#8221;, they have to gauge how &#8220;good&#8221; it is by comparing it against the best, which is the Porsche brand.</p>
<p>But one does not have to rely on these articles to realize that Porsches are the cars used as the measuring stick. I am sure you have all experienced it when your driving on city streets or on the hightways and some nutbag in a souped-up car or in a BMW, Benz, Audi, etc. all seem to want to race you and see how good and fast their car is against your Porsche.</p>
<p>Anyhow, as the slogan goes: Porsche&#8230;there is no substitute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
